Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E6510

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E6510

Report a correction
More l3 cache 12 MB vs 4 MB 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Core i7 3687U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3687U

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.73 GHz More than 90% higher turbo clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 85.31W 6.2x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 1.73 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 64 °C Around 65% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Mar, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 25.29 $/year 6.2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 91.98 $/year 6.2x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Xeon E6510  vs Core i7 3687U 

clock speed

Xeon E6510
1.73 GHz
Core i7 3687U
2.1 GHz

turbo clock speed

Xeon E6510
1.73 GHz
Core i7 3687U
3.3 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E6510  vs
Core i7 3687U 
Clock speed 1.73 GHz 2.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.73 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1567
BGA 1023

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Architecture QPI DMI
Number of links 4 1
Transfer rate 4,800 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Xeon E6510  vs
Core i7 3687U 
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 4 MB
L3 cache per core 3 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 64°C Unknown - 105°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,200 MHz

power consumption

TDP 105W 17W
Annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year 14.89 $/year
Typical power consumption 85.31W 13.81W
Intel Xeon E6510
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3687U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus