Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E6510

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E6510

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Celeron N2840

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2840

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz vs 1.73 GHz Around 50% higher turbo clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 6.09W vs 85.31W 14x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 2.16 GHz vs 1.73 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Newer Jul, 2014 vs Mar, 2010 Release date over 4 years later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year vs 25.29 $/year 14x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year vs 91.98 $/year 14x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Xeon E6510  vs Celeron N2840 

clock speed

Xeon E6510
1.73 GHz
Celeron N2840
2.16 GHz

turbo clock speed

Xeon E6510
1.73 GHz
Celeron N2840
2.58 GHz

L2 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E6510  vs
Celeron N2840 
Clock speed 1.73 GHz 2.16 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.73 GHz 2.58 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 105W 7.5W
Annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year 1.81 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year 6.57 $/year
Typical power consumption 85.31W 6.09W

details

Xeon E6510  vs
Celeron N2840 
Threads 8 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 311 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 792 MHz

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 4 1
Intel Xeon E6510
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N2840
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus