Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E6510

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E6510

Report a correction
Significantly more l3 cache 12 MB vs 0.5 MB 24x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 1.73 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much more l3 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 12x more l3 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD E1 1200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 1200

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 85.31W 5.8x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 64 °C More than 55% higher Maximum operating temperature
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 25.29 $/year 5.8x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 91.98 $/year 5.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Mar, 2010 Release date over 2 years later

Features Key features of the Xeon E6510  vs E1 1200 

clock speed

Xeon E6510
1.73 GHz
E1 1200
1.4 GHz

L2 cache

Xeon E6510
1 MB
E1 1200
1 MB

L3 cache

Xeon E6510
12 MB
E1 1200
0.5 MB

TDP

Xeon E6510
105W
E1 1200
18W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E6510  vs
E1 1200 
Clock speed 1.73 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Xeon E6510  vs
E1 1200 
Threads 8 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 64°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0

power consumption

TDP 105W 18W
Annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year 15.77 $/year
Typical power consumption 85.31W 14.63W
Intel Xeon E6510
Report a correction
AMD E1 1200
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus