Intel Xeon E5620 vs E5-2407 |
Released March, 2010
Intel Xeon E5620
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
5.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5620
 | Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.75 GHz |
| | More l3 cache 12 MB | | More threads 8 |
VS
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2407
- 2.2 GHz
- Quad core
5.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E5-2407
| | Supports more RAM 393,216 MB | | Newer May, 2012 |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5620 vs E5-2407 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon E5620CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.75 GHz | vs | 2.35 GHz | Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| More l3 cache | 12 MB | vs | 10 MB | 20% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | More than 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 2.5 MB/core | 20% more l3 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Supports more RAM | 393,216 MB | vs | 294,912 MB | Supports around 35% more RAM | |||
| Newer | May, 2012 | vs | Mar, 2010 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5620 vs E5-2407
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5620 | vs | E5-2407 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 80W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 7.59 pt/W | 7.31 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 65W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Triple Channel | Triple Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,599.99 MB/s | 25,599.99 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 294,912 MB | 393,216 MB | |
details | Xeon E5620 | vs | E5-2407 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 10 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Voltage range | 0.75 - 1.35V | 0.6 - 1.35V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 12 | 0 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.75 GHz | 2.35 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.75 GHz | 2.35 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
| Data rate | 46,928 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 5,860 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 2,930 MHz | 3,200 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon E5620  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2407 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $279 | $298 | |
| Intel Xeon E5620 vs E5606 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $140 | ||
| AMD FX 8320 vs Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $21 | ||
| Intel Core i3 370M vs Apple A6 (APL0598) | ||
 | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| Intel Celeron N3000 vs AMD A4 7th Gen A4-9120 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $261 | $601 | |
| Intel Xeon E3-1240 vs L5430 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $120 | ||
| AMD A8 7600 vs FX 6100 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $72 | $72 | |
| Intel Pentium E5300 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
