CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5620 vs 4770 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 4770 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4770  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5620

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5620

Report a correction
More l3 cache 12 MB vs 8 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly more l3 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Supports more RAM 294,912 MB vs 32,768 MB Supports 9x more RAM
Higher Maximum operating temperature 77.6 °C vs 72.72 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz vs 4.01 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770

Report a correction
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 2.66 GHz More than 45% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 3.12 pt/$ vs 2.18 pt/$ Around 45% better performance per dollar
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 2,029 vs 1,059 More than 90% better PassMark (Single core) score
Significantly better PassMark score 9,523 vs 4,873 More than 95% better PassMark score
Better performance per watt 10.41 pt/W vs 7.59 pt/W More than 35% better performance per watt
Newer Jun, 2013 vs Mar, 2010 Release date over 3 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5620 vs Core i7 4770

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5620
14,086
Core i7 4770
13,342

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5620
1,898
Core i7 4770
3,514

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5620
1,280,000 MB/s
Core i7 4770
4,500,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5620
8,737
Core i7 4770
13,074

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5620
11,417
Core i7 4770
14,063

GeekBench

Xeon E5620
11,417
Core i7 4770
14,063

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E5620
4,873
Core i7 4770
9,523

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon E5620
1,059
Core i7 4770
2,029

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5620  vs
Core i7 4770 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.66 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA3
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 80W 84W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 73.58 $/year
Performance per watt 7.59 pt/W 10.41 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 68.25W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI 2.0
Number of links 2 0
Transfer rate 5,860 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Xeon E5620  vs
Core i7 4770 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 3 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 77.6°C Unknown - 72.72°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.75 GHz 3.85 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz 4.01 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.75 GHz 3.85 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,200 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Triple Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 25,599.99 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 294,912 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Xeon E5620
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 4770
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus