CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5620 vs 6164 HE among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon E5620

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Xeon E5620

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5620

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5620

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Much better performance per watt 7.59 pt/W vs 1.69 pt/W Around 4.5x better performance per watt
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.75 GHz vs 2.59 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l3 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 3x more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of AMD Opteron 6164 HE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6164 HE

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 12 vs 4 Three times as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 12 vs 8 4 more threads
Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 2 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5620 vs Opteron 6164 HE

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5620  vs
Opteron 6164 HE 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Duodeca core
Socket type
LGA 1366
G34

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

details

Xeon E5620  vs
Opteron 6164 HE 
Threads 8 12
L2 cache 1 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 12 MB
L3 cache per core 3 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 2 4
Clock multiplier 18 8
Voltage range 0.75 - 1.35V 1.07 - UnknownV
Operating temperature Unknown - 77.6°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.75 GHz 2.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz 1.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.75 GHz 2.59 GHz

power consumption

TDP 80W 85W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 20.48 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 74.46 $/year
Performance per watt 7.59 pt/W 1.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 69.06W

bus

Architecture QPI HyperTransport 3.0
Clock speed 2,930 MHz 3,200 MHz
Intel Xeon E5620
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 6164 HE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus