CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5507 vs E5-1650 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E5-1650 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-1650  based on its performance, single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5507

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5507

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 65W vs 105.63W Around 40% lower typical power consumption
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year vs 113.88 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year vs 31.32 $/year Around 40% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-1650

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-1650

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.26 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Much more l3 cache 12 MB vs 4 MB 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark score 11,790 vs 3,147 Around 3.8x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,922 vs 954 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Much better performance per watt 7.9 pt/W vs 1.64 pt/W More than 4.8x better performance per watt
Much better performance per dollar 1.76 pt/$ vs 0.47 pt/$ More than 3.8x better performance per dollar
More threads 12 vs 4 Three times as many threads
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.53 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Supports more RAM 262,144 MB vs 147,456 MB Supports around 80% more RAM
Newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.7 GHz vs 3.97 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More l2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core Around 35% more l2 cache per core
Newer Mar, 2012 vs Mar, 2010 Release date over 2 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5507 vs E5-1650

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5507
4,902
Xeon E5-1650
16,658

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5507
1,511
Xeon E5-1650
2,937

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5507
97,000 MB/s
Xeon E5-1650
2,210,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5507
4,778
Xeon E5-1650
18,198

GeekBench

Xeon E5507
4,885
Xeon E5-1650
19,270

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E5507
3,147
Xeon E5-1650
11,790

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5507  vs
E5-1650 
Clock speed 2.26 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Hexa core
Socket type
LGA 1366
LGA 2011

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 80W 130W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 31.32 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 113.88 $/year
Performance per watt 1.64 pt/W 7.9 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 105.63W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Triple Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 19,200 MB/s 51,200 MB/s
Maximum memory size 147,456 MB 262,144 MB

details

Xeon E5507  vs
E5-1650 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 12
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.33 MB/core
L3 cache 4 MB 12 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Voltage range 0.75 - 1.35V 0.6 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 76°C Unknown - 64°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.3 GHz 4.53 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.97 GHz 4.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.3 GHz 4.53 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 0
Transfer rate 4,800 MT/s 0 MT/s
Clock speed 2,400 MHz 0 MHz
Intel Xeon E5507
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E5-1650
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus