Winner
Intel Core2 Duo E8500
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core2 Duo E8500 based on its single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon E5504 vs Core2 Duo E8500 |
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 | ![]() | Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,940 |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | More threads 4 |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 6 MB | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.16 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.46 GHz |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.1 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E8500CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,940 | vs | 3,230 | Around 55% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Newer | Mar, 2009 | vs | Jan, 2008 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature | 76 °C | vs | 72.4 °C | Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 6 MB | vs | 1 MB | 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.16 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 60% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 12x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.46 GHz | vs | 2.82 GHz | Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,318 | vs | 821 | More than 60% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 65W | Around 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Better performance per dollar | 0.63 pt/$ | vs | 0.51 pt/$ | Around 25% better performance per dollar | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.42 GHz | vs | 3.43 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 70.08 $/year | Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 19.27 $/year | Around 20% lower annual home energy cost |
summary | Xeon E5504 | vs | Core2 Duo E8500 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.16 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1366 | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.49 pt/W | 1.93 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 52.81W |
details | Xeon E5504 | vs | Core2 Duo E8500 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 15 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.75 - 1.35V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 76°C | Unknown - 72.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.82 GHz | 4.46 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.43 GHz | 4.42 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.82 GHz | 4.46 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | FSB | |
Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 2,400 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
Intel Xeon E5504 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E8500 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Duo E8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $200 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs E8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $200 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Duo E8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$285 | $200 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8600 vs E8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $200 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E7500 vs E8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $200 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Core2 Duo E8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $200 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 vs Duo E8500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||