0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5450 vs E5420 |
Released November, 2007
Intel Xeon E5450
- 3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5450
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz |
![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.1 GHz |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5450 vs E5420 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | 20% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.83 GHz | vs | 3.19 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.1 GHz | vs | 3.94 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E5420 vs the E5450. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5450 vs E5420
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5450
6,390
Xeon E5420
5,821
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5450
1,619
Xeon E5420
1,317
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5450
128,600 MB/s
Xeon E5420
106,200 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5450
5,457
Xeon E5420
4,529
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5450
6,298
Xeon E5420
6,104
GeekBench
Xeon E5450
6,298
Xeon E5420
6,104
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5450
4,244
Xeon E5420
3,534
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5450
1,270
Xeon E5420
1,073
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5450 | vs | E5420 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 80W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.1 pt/W | 1.78 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 65W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Xeon E5450 | vs | E5420 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 820,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 7 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.35V | 0.85 - 1.35V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 67°C | Unknown - 67°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.83 GHz | 3.19 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.1 GHz | 3.94 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.83 GHz | 3.19 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon E5450 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5420 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$339 | $969 | |
Q9650 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$912 | $969 | |
X5450 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | ||
Q6600 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,245 | $969 | |
X5460 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $969 | |
Q9550 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $969 | |
E8400 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$324 | $347 | |
E5335 vs E5420 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||