Winner
Intel Xeon E5450
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5450 based on its performance.
See full details | Intel Xeon E5450 vs E5240 |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | More threads 4 | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.1 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.89 GHz | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 52.81W |
![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year | ![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.3 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
Intel Xeon E5450CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 6 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.1 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.89 GHz | vs | 3.83 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 65W | Around 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 70.08 $/year | Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 19.27 $/year | Around 20% lower annual home energy cost |
summary | Xeon E5450 | vs | E5240 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.1 pt/W | 1.86 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Xeon E5450 | vs | E5240 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 410,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.35V | 0.85 - 1.35V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 67°C | Unknown - 66°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.83 GHz | 4.89 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.1 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.83 GHz | 4.89 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon E5450 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5240 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$339 | $969 | |
Q9650 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$912 | $969 | |
X5450 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,245 | $969 | |
X5460 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | ||
Q6600 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | $969 | |
E8400 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $969 | |
Q9550 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,022 | $969 | |
E5472 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
5300 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||