CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5450 vs A10 PRO-7850B among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5450

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5450

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 4 MB 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 3x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 65W vs 77.19W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B

Reasons to consider the
AMD PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Better performance per watt 3.94 pt/W vs 2.1 pt/W Around 90% better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,507 vs 1,270 Around 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better PassMark score 5,614 vs 4,244 More than 30% better PassMark score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72.4 °C vs 67 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.81 GHz vs 4.1 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5450 vs PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5450  vs
PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B 
Clock speed 3 GHz 3.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
FMA4
AES

power consumption

TDP 80W 95W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 2.1 pt/W 3.94 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 77.19W

details

Xeon E5450  vs
PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 12 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 28 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C Unknown - 72.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.83 GHz 3.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.1 GHz 4.81 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz 3.7 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ R7
Latest DirectX N/A 12.0
GPU clock speed N/A 720 MHz
Intel Xeon E5450
Report a correction
AMD PRO A A10 A10 PRO-7850B
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus