CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5450 vs 2384 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Xeon E5450
5.5
Opteron 2384
5.5
Core2 Quad Q6600
5.3
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Xeon E5450
7.9
Opteron 2384
7.5
Core2 Quad Q6600
7.5
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Xeon E5450
n.d.
Opteron 2384
n.d.
Core2 Quad Q6600
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Xeon E5450
0.0
Opteron 2384
0.0
Core2 Quad Q6600
0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Xeon E5450
5.1
Opteron 2384
5.1
Core2 Quad Q6600
5.0
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Xeon E5450
n.d.
Opteron 2384
n.d.
Core2 Quad Q6600
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon E5450

CPUBoss Winner
 Front view of Intel Xeon E5450
Front view of AMD Opteron 2384

AMD Opteron 2384

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5450

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5450

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 2 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 6x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz vs 2.7 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Opteron 2384

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2384

Report a correction
Newer Nov, 2008 vs Nov, 2007 Release date a year later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5450 vs Opteron 2384

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5450
6,390
Opteron 2384
8,798

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5450
1,619
Opteron 2384
1,334

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5450
128,600 MB/s
Opteron 2384
108,800 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E5450
4,244
Opteron 2384
3,538

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon E5450
1,270
Opteron 2384
972

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Xeon E5450  vs
Opteron 2384 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
F

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 80W 75W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 65.7 $/year
Performance per watt 2.1 pt/W 2.12 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 60.94W

details

 Xeon E5450  vs
Opteron 2384 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 12 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 9 13
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.35V 1.3 - UnknownV
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 3.83 GHz 2.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.1 GHz 2.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz 2.7 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 2,200 MHz
Intel Xeon E5450
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2384
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss