0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5450 vs AMD Opteron 2222 |
Released November, 2007
Intel Xeon E5450
- 3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5450
![]() | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 2 MB | 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 3x more l2 cache per core | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.83 GHz | vs | 3.23 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.1 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 77.19W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Opteron 2222 vs the Intel Xeon E5450. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5450 vs Opteron 2222
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5450
6,390
Opteron 2222
4,263
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5450
1,619
Opteron 2222
1,258
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5450
128,600 MB/s
Opteron 2222
129,100 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5450
4,244
Opteron 2222
1,843
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5450
1,270
Opteron 2222
951
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5450 | vs | Opteron 2222 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
F | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.1 pt/W | 1.3 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 77.19W |
details | Xeon E5450 | vs | Opteron 2222 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 9 | 15 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.35V | 1.3 - UnknownV | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 67°C | 0 - 55°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.83 GHz | 3.23 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.83 GHz | 3.23 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon E5450 ![]() | AMD Opteron 2222 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | $339 | |
E5450 vs Q9650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | $912 | |
E5450 vs X5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | $1,245 | |
E5450 vs X5460 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | ||
E5450 vs Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | $179 | |
E5450 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | $287 | |
E5450 vs Q9550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | $240 | |
E5450 vs 3770 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||