Winner
Intel Core i5 3570K
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i5 3570K based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details Intel Xeon E5440 vs Core i5 3570K |
Released November, 2007
Intel Xeon E5440
- 2.83 GHz
- Quad core
5.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5440
 | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core |
| | Much lower typical power consumption 65W | | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released April, 2012
Intel Core i5 3570K
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
9 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i5 3570K
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Much better performance per dollar 3.09 pt/$ |
| | Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5440 vs 3570K among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Core i5 3570KCPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 1 MB | 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 12x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 107.5W | Around 40% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 38.81 $/year | 2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 106 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 3.09 pt/$ | vs | 0.22 pt/$ | Around 14.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| Higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.83 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,012 | vs | 1,208 | More than 65% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.59 GHz | vs | 3.61 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better PassMark score | 7,152 | vs | 4,000 | Around 80% better PassMark score | |||
| Newer | Apr, 2012 | vs | Nov, 2007 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
| Better performance per watt | 4.69 pt/W | vs | 2 pt/W | More than 2.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.71 GHz | vs | 3.96 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5440 vs Core i5 3570K
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5440 | vs | Core i5 3570K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 771 | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 77W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 38.81 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 106 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2 pt/W | 4.69 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 107.5W | |
details | Xeon E5440 | vs | Core i5 3570K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
| Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 1,400,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 8 | 34 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 67°C | Unknown - 67.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.61 GHz | 4.59 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.96 GHz | 4.71 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.61 GHz | 4.59 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 10.x | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | 5,339.9 | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Xeon E5440  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 3570K Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $184 | $128 | |
| 3570K vs 8350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $184 | $100 | |
| 3570K vs 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $184 | $264 | |
| 3570K vs 3770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $184 | $220 | |
| 3570K vs 2500K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $184 | $192 | |
| 3570K vs 4670K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $184 | ||
| 3570K vs Q6600 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $184 | $240 | |
| 3570K vs 3770 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
