0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5410 vs E5320 |
Released November, 2007
Intel Xeon E5410
- 2.33 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5410
![]() | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.33 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 45 nm |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Xeon E5410CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 8 MB | 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 2.33 GHz | vs | 1.86 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 50% more l2 cache per core | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.48 GHz | vs | 1.87 GHz | More than 85% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.96 GHz | vs | 2.81 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer | Nov, 2007 | vs | Nov, 2006 | Release date a year later | |||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E5320 vs the E5410. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5410 vs E5320
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5410
7,496
Xeon E5320
6,799
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5410
1,228
Xeon E5320
1,028
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5410
98,800 MB/s
Xeon E5320
93,300 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5410
4,183
Xeon E5320
3,058
GeekBench
Xeon E5410
4,183
Xeon E5320
3,172
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5410
3,284
Xeon E5320
2,288
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5410
1,001
Xeon E5320
718
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5410 | vs | E5320 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 1.86 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 80W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 19.27 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 70.08 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.81 pt/W | 1.52 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 65W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 1,066 MHz |
details | Xeon E5410 | vs | E5320 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Clock multiplier | 7 | 7 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.35V | 1 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 67°C | Unknown - 66°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.96 GHz | 2.81 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.48 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.96 GHz | 2.81 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Xeon E5410 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5320 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$284 | $264 | |
Intel Xeon E5410 vs Core i7 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$284 | ||
Intel Xeon E5410 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$284 | $179 | |
Intel Xeon E5410 vs Core2 Quad Q8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$284 | $179 | |
Intel Xeon E5410 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$284 | $220 | |
Intel Xeon E5410 vs Core i5 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$284 | $969 | |
Intel Xeon E5410 vs E5450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | ||
Intel Xeon E5320 vs Core i7 920 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||