Winner
Intel Core i7 3770K
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770K based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details | Intel Xeon E5410 vs Core i7 3770K |
![]() | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 65W | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.21 pt/$ |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
8.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 1 MB | 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 12x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 114.97W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 42.19 $/year | 2.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 112.39 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.33 GHz | More than 50% higher clock speed | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.21 pt/$ | vs | 0.51 pt/$ | More than 4.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,084 | vs | 1,001 | More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Significantly better PassMark score | 9,544 | vs | 3,284 | Around 3x better PassMark score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.69 GHz | vs | 2.96 GHz | Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer | Apr, 2012 | vs | Nov, 2007 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
Better performance per watt | 4.55 pt/W | vs | 1.81 pt/W | More than 2.5x better performance per watt | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.8 GHz | vs | 3.48 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
summary | Xeon E5410 | vs | Core i7 3770K |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 77W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 42.19 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 112.39 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.81 pt/W | 4.55 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 114.97W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Xeon E5410 | vs | Core i7 3770K |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 1,400,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 7 | 35 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.35V | 1.33 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 67°C | Unknown - 67.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.96 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.48 GHz | 4.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.96 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.x | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
3DMark06 | N/A | 5,339.9 |
Intel Xeon E5410 ![]() | Intel Core i7 3770K ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$128 | $264 | |
AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i7 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $264 | |
Intel Core i7 3770 vs 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $264 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | $264 | |
Intel Core i5 3570K vs i7 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $264 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$330 | $264 | |
Intel Core i7 2600K vs 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$520 | $264 | |
Intel Xeon X5650 vs Core i7 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||