Winner
Intel Core i7 3770K
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770K based on its performance, single-core performance and value.
See full details Intel Xeon E5410 vs Core i7 3770K |
Released November, 2007
Intel Xeon E5410
- 2.33 GHz
- Quad core
5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5410
 | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core |
| | Much lower typical power consumption 65W | | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released April, 2012
Intel Core i7 3770K
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
8.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i7 3770K
| | Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Much better performance per dollar 2.21 pt/$ |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5410 vs 3770K among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 8.6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 1 MB | 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 12x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 65W | vs | 114.97W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | vs | 42.19 $/year | 2.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | vs | 112.39 $/year | Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.33 GHz | More than 50% higher clock speed | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 2.21 pt/$ | vs | 0.51 pt/$ | More than 4.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,084 | vs | 1,001 | More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 9,544 | vs | 3,284 | Around 3x better PassMark score | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.69 GHz | vs | 2.96 GHz | Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Newer | Apr, 2012 | vs | Nov, 2007 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Better performance per watt | 4.55 pt/W | vs | 1.81 pt/W | More than 2.5x better performance per watt | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.8 GHz | vs | 3.48 GHz | Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5410 vs Core i7 3770K
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5410 | vs | Core i7 3770K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 771 | |||
| LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 80W | 77W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 42.19 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 112.39 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.81 pt/W | 4.55 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 65W | 114.97W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Xeon E5410 | vs | Core i7 3770K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 22 nm | |
| Transistor count | 820,000,000 | 1,400,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 7 | 35 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.35V | 1.33 - 1.36V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 67°C | Unknown - 67.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.96 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.48 GHz | 4.8 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.96 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.x | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | 5,339.9 | |
 Intel Xeon E5410  Report a correction |  Intel Core i7 3770K Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $128 | $264 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i7 3770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $264 | |
| Intel Core i7 3770 vs 3770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $248 | $264 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs 3770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $184 | $264 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570K vs i7 3770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $264 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 3770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $330 | $264 | |
| Intel Core i7 2600K vs 3770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $264 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 3770K | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
