CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5410 vs 2222 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E5410 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5410  based on its performance, single-core performance and cost to run.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5410

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5410

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 2 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 3 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 3x more l2 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Lower typical power consumption 65W vs 77.19W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.48 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD Opteron 2222

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2222

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.33 GHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.23 GHz vs 2.96 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5410 vs Opteron 2222

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5410
7,496
Opteron 2222
4,263

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5410
1,228
Opteron 2222
1,258

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5410
98,800 MB/s
Opteron 2222
129,100 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E5410
3,284
Opteron 2222
1,843

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5410  vs
Opteron 2222 
Clock speed 2.33 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771
F

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 80W 95W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 1.81 pt/W 1.3 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 77.19W

details

Xeon E5410  vs
Opteron 2222 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 12 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 3 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 7 15
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.35V 1.3 - UnknownV
Operating temperature Unknown - 67°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.96 GHz 3.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.48 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.96 GHz 3.23 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon E5410
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2222
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus