CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5345 vs 3770T among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores
Xeon E5345
5.4
Core i7 3770T
6.0
Core i5 2500K
5.6
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance
Xeon E5345
5.7
Core i7 3770T
8.0
Core i5 2500K
8.1
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Xeon E5345
0.0
Core i7 3770T
n.d.
Core i5 2500K
n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Xeon E5345
0.0
Core i7 3770T
6.2
Core i5 2500K
n.d.
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Xeon E5345
5.0
Core i7 3770T
5.5
Core i5 2500K
5.2
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?
Xeon E5345
n.d.
Core i7 3770T
n.d.
Core i5 2500K
6.3
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more
8.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets
Xeon E5345
5.1
Core i7 3770T
8.2
Core i5 2500K
7.9

Winner
Intel Core i7 3770T 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770T  based on its performance, single-core performance, power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon E5345

Front view of Intel Xeon E5345
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770T

Intel Core i7 3770T

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5345

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5345

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770T

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770T

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per dollar 2.03 pt/$ vs 0.31 pt/$ Around 6.5x better performance per dollar
Much better performance per watt 14.88 pt/W vs 1.81 pt/W Around 8.2x better performance per watt
Significantly lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 65W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,937 vs 916 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Slightly higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 2.33 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 8,196 vs 2,958 More than 2.8x better PassMark score
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Nov, 2006 Release date over 5 years later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 70.08 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 19.27 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Higher Maximum operating temperature 69.8 °C vs 66 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5345 vs Core i7 3770T

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5345
8,389
Core i7 3770T
10,712

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5345
1,242
Core i7 3770T
2,863

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5345
94,300 MB/s
Core i7 3770T
2,150,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5345
4,114
Core i7 3770T
10,736

GeekBench

Xeon E5345
4,114
Core i7 3770T
13,734

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E5345
2,958
Core i7 3770T
8,196

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon E5345
916
Core i7 3770T
1,937

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Xeon E5345  vs
Core i7 3770T 
Clock speed 2.33 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 1155

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 80W 45W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 1.81 pt/W 14.88 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 36.56W

bus
Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,333 MHz 2,500 MHz

details

 Xeon E5345  vs
Core i7 3770T 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Transistor count 582,000,000 1.4
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 7 25
Voltage range 1 - 1.5V 0.92 - 1.1V
Operating temperature Unknown - 66°C Unknown - 69.8°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.7 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.33 GHz 2.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.7 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Xeon E5345
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3770T
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
Nirmal Sudan (08:51 AM, July 25, 2014)
A Dual Socket E3345 with Quad Channel ECC RAM and Solid State Disks does the job and costs half the price these days !!! Dell Precision 690 will do the trick !
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss