0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5345 vs Core i7 3770T |
Released November, 2006
Intel Xeon E5345
- 2.33 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5345
![]() | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 |
VS
Released April, 2012
Intel Core i7 3770T
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core i7 3770T
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 2.03 pt/$ | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 14.88 pt/W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 2.03 pt/$ | vs | 0.31 pt/$ | Around 6.5x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better performance per watt | 14.88 pt/W | vs | 1.81 pt/W | Around 8.2x better performance per watt | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 65W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,937 | vs | 916 | More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Slightly higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 2.33 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly better PassMark score | 8,196 | vs | 2,958 | More than 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Newer | Apr, 2012 | vs | Nov, 2006 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More threads | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many threads | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 70.08 $/year | Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 19.27 $/year | Around 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 69.8 °C | vs | 66 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5345 vs Core i7 3770T
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5345
8,389
Core i7 3770T
10,712
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5345
1,242
Core i7 3770T
2,863
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5345
94,300 MB/s
Core i7 3770T
2,150,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5345
4,114
Core i7 3770T
10,736
GeekBench
Xeon E5345
4,114
Core i7 3770T
13,734
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5345
2,958
Core i7 3770T
8,196
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5345
916
Core i7 3770T
1,937
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5345 | vs | Core i7 3770T |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.33 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 771 | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 80W | 45W | |
Annual home energy cost | 19.27 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 70.08 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.81 pt/W | 14.88 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 65W | 36.56W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 1,333 MHz | 2,500 MHz |
details | Xeon E5345 | vs | Core i7 3770T |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
Transistor count | 582,000,000 | 1.4 | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 7 | 25 | |
Voltage range | 1 - 1.5V | 0.92 - 1.1V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 66°C | Unknown - 69.8°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.33 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Supports ECC | No | No |
Intel Xeon E5345 ![]() | Intel Core i7 3770T ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $330 | |
3770K vs 3770T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $330 | |
3770 vs 3770T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$325 | $330 | |
3770S vs 3770T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$320 | $330 | |
E3-1265L v2 vs 3770T | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$220 | $459 | |
2500K vs E5345 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$217 | $459 | |
E3-1225 vs E5345 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$459 | ||
Q6600 vs E5345 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Nirmal Sudan (08:51 AM, July 25, 2014)