Intel Xeon E5320 vs 3065

older Released November, 2006

Intel Xeon E5320

1.86 GHz
Quad core

Front view of Intel Xeon E5320

4.4 Out of 10

Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5320

	Much more l2 cache 8 MB		More cores 4
	More threads 4		Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2

VS

older Released October, 2007

Intel Xeon 3065

2.33 GHz
Dual core

Front view of Intel Xeon 3065

4 Out of 10

Reasons to buy the 3065

	Much higher clock speed 2.33 GHz		Supports trusted computing Yes
	Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.17 GHz		Lower typical power consumption 52.81W

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Xeon E5320 5.5 Xeon 3065 5.1 Core2 Duo E8400 5.2
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Xeon E5320 6.8 Xeon 3065 5.2 Core2 Duo E8400 7.7
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Xeon E5320 n.d. Xeon 3065 n.d. Core2 Duo E8400 n.d.
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Xeon E5320 0.0 Xeon 3065 0.0 Core2 Duo E8400 0.0
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Xeon E5320 5.1 Xeon 3065 5.1 Core2 Duo E8400 5.1
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
Xeon E5320 n.d. Xeon 3065 n.d. Core2 Duo E8400 n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.4	CPUBoss Score
	Combination of all six facets
Xeon E5320 4.4 Xeon 3065 4.0 Core2 Duo E8400 4.6

Winner
Intel Xeon 3065

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon 3065 based on its single-core performance and cost to run.

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Intel Xeon E5320

Front view of Intel Xeon E5320

Front view of Intel Xeon 3065

Intel Xeon 3065

Join the discussion

Front view of Intel Xeon E5320

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5320

Report a correction

Much more l2 cache

8 MB

vs

4 MB

2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later

More cores

4

vs

2

Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

More threads

4

vs

2

Twice as many threads

Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration

2

vs

1

Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration

Front view of Intel Xeon 3065

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 3065

Report a correction

Much higher clock speed

2.33 GHz

vs

1.86 GHz

More than 25% higher clock speed

Supports trusted computing

Yes

vs

No

Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing

Much better overclocked clock speed (Air)

3.17 GHz

vs

2.81 GHz

Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Lower typical power consumption

52.81W

vs

65W

Around 20% lower typical power consumption

Much better overclocked clock speed (Water)

2.33 GHz

vs

1.87 GHz

More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Lower annual commercial energy cost

56.94 $/year

vs

70.08 $/year

Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost

Lower annual home energy cost

15.66 $/year

vs

19.27 $/year

Around 20% lower annual home energy cost

Newer

Oct, 2007

vs

Nov, 2006

Release date 10 months later

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

6,799

2,222

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

1,028

1,239

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

93,300 MB/s

99.1 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

2,288

1,504

PassMark (Single Core)

718

864

summary	Xeon E5320	vs	3065
Clock speed	1.86 GHz		2.33 GHz
Cores	Quad core		Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 775
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Supports trusted computing	No		Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes		Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
power consumption
TDP	80W		65W
Annual home energy cost	19.27 $/year		15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost	70.08 $/year		56.94 $/year
Performance per watt	1.52 pt/W		0.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption	65W		52.81W
bus
Architecture	FSB		FSB
Number of links	1		1
Clock speed	1,066 MHz		1,333 MHz

details	Xeon E5320	vs	3065
Architecture	x86-64		x86-64
Threads	4		2
L2 cache	8 MB		4 MB
L2 cache per core	2 MB/core		2 MB/core
Manufacture process	65 nm		65 nm
Transistor count	582,000,000		291,000,000
Max CPUs	2		1
Clock multiplier	7		7
Voltage range	1 - 1.5V		0.85 - 1.5V
Operating temperature	Unknown - 66°C		Unknown - 72°C
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	2.81 GHz		3.17 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	1.87 GHz		2.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	2.81 GHz		3.17 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	None		None
Label	N/A		N/A
Latest DirectX	N/A		N/A
Number of displays supported	N/A		N/A
GPU clock speed	N/A		N/A
Turbo clock speed	N/A		N/A
3DMark06	N/A		N/A

Intel Xeon E5320

Report a correction

Intel Xeon 3065

Report a correction

VS

Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Xeon E5320

VS

Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Xeon 3065

Comments

comments powered by Disqus