CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5320 vs 3065 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon 3065 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon 3065  based on its single-core performance and cost to run.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5320

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5320

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 4 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Xeon 3065

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 3065

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.33 GHz vs 1.86 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.17 GHz vs 2.81 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 65W Around 20% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.33 GHz vs 1.87 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 70.08 $/year Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 19.27 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Oct, 2007 vs Nov, 2006 Release date 10 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5320 vs 3065

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5320
6,799
Xeon 3065
2,222

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5320
1,028
Xeon 3065
1,239

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5320
93,300 MB/s
Xeon 3065
99.1 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E5320
2,288
Xeon 3065
1,504

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5320  vs
3065 
Clock speed 1.86 GHz 2.33 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 80W 65W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.52 pt/W 0.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 52.81W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,066 MHz 1,333 MHz

details

Xeon E5320  vs
3065 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 8 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 582,000,000 291,000,000
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 7 7
Voltage range 1 - 1.5V 0.85 - 1.5V
Operating temperature Unknown - 66°C Unknown - 72°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.81 GHz 3.17 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.87 GHz 2.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.81 GHz 3.17 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon E5320
Report a correction
Intel Xeon 3065
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus