CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5310 vs 5110 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon E5310

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Xeon E5310

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5310

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5310

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 4 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Xeon 5110

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon 5110

Report a correction
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.51 GHz vs 2.19 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 65W Around 20% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 70.08 $/year Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 19.27 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5310 vs 5110

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5310
5,971
Xeon 5110
3,028

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5310
81,900 MB/s
Xeon 5110
68,550 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E5310
2,264
Xeon 5110
1,079

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5310  vs
5110 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 771

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 80W 65W
Annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.36 pt/W 1.17 pt/W
Typical power consumption 65W 52.81W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 1,066 MHz 1,066 MHz

details

Xeon E5310  vs
5110 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 8 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 582,000,000 291,000,000
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 6 6
Voltage range 1 - 1.5V 1 - 1.5V
Operating temperature Unknown - 66°C Unknown - 65°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.19 GHz 2.51 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.19 GHz 2.51 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Xeon E5310
Report a correction
Intel Xeon 5110
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus