Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5220

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of Intel Core i3 6100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 6100

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 2.33 GHz Around 60% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.25 GHz vs 2.33 GHz More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Feb, 2008 Release date over 7 years later
Lower typical power consumption 41.44W vs 52.81W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.39 GHz vs 2.33 GHz Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Lower annual home energy cost 12.29 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 20% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 44.68 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Xeon E5220  vs Core i3 6100 

clock speed

Xeon E5220
2.33 GHz
Core i3 6100
3.7 GHz

overclocked clock speed (air)

Xeon E5220
2.33 GHz
Core i3 6100
4.25 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Xeon E5220
2.33 GHz
Core i3 6100
4.39 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5220  vs
Core i3 6100 
Clock speed 2.33 GHz 3.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 65W 51W
Annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year 12.29 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year 44.68 $/year
Typical power consumption 52.81W 41.44W

details

Xeon E5220  vs
Core i3 6100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 45 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 66°C Unknown - 65°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.33 GHz 4.25 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.33 GHz 4.39 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.33 GHz 4.25 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 530
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Xeon E5220
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 6100
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus