0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 vs E5-2699 v3 |
Released April, 2015
Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3
- 2.1 GHz
- Processing Cores
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 109.69W |
![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 87.6 °C | ![]() | Newer Apr, 2015 |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
- 2.3 GHz
- Processing Cores
Reasons to buy the E5-2699 v3
![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower typical power consumption | 109.69W | vs | 117.81W | More than 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 87.6 °C | vs | 76.4 °C | Around 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer | Apr, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date 9 months later | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | vs | 34.93 $/year | More than 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | vs | 127.02 $/year | More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | Around 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed |
Features Key features of the Xeon E5-4669 v3 vs E5-2699 v3
clock speed
Xeon E5-4669 v3
2.1 GHz
Xeon E5-2699 v3
2.3 GHz
turbo clock speed
Xeon E5-4669 v3
2.9 GHz
Xeon E5-2699 v3
3.6 GHz
TDP
Xeon E5-4669 v3
135W
Xeon E5-2699 v3
145W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-4669 v3 | vs | E5-2699 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Cores | Processing Cores | Processing Cores | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 786,432 MB |
details | Xeon E5-4669 v3 | vs | E5-2699 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 36 | 36 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 87.6°C | Unknown - 76.4°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 135W | 145W | |
Annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | 34.93 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | 127.02 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 109.69W | 117.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,016 | $4,115 | |
Intel Core i7 5960X vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$4,115 | $4,115 | |
Intel E5-2699V4 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $4,115 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$4,115 | ||
Intel Xeon E5-2689 vs E5-2699 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $4,115 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,300 | $4,115 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs E5-2699 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,806 | $4,115 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs E5-2699 v3 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
Adam McMahan (11:44 AM, January 10, 2016)