Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3

Report a correction
More cores 18 vs 4 14 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 36 vs 8 28 more threads
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Supports more RAM 786,432 MB vs 32,768 MB Supports 24x more RAM
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 87.6 °C vs 67.4 °C Around 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Apr, 2015 vs Apr, 2012 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz Around 35% higher turbo clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 62.56W vs 109.69W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 18.55 $/year vs 32.52 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 67.45 $/year vs 118.26 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Xeon E5-4669 v3  vs Core i7 3770 

clock speed

Xeon E5-4669 v3
2.1 GHz
Core i7 3770
3.4 GHz

turbo clock speed

Xeon E5-4669 v3
2.9 GHz
Core i7 3770
3.9 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-4669 v3  vs
Core i7 3770 
Clock speed 2.1 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.9 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Processing Cores Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum memory size 786,432 MB 32,768 MB

details

Xeon E5-4669 v3  vs
Core i7 3770 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 36 8
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 4 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 87.6°C Unknown - 67.4°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 11.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,339.9

power consumption

TDP 135W 77W
Annual home energy cost 32.52 $/year 18.55 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year 67.45 $/year
Typical power consumption 109.69W 62.56W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI
Number of links 2 1
Transfer rate 9,600 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3770
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus