Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 based on its value.
See full details | Intel Xeon E5-4660 v3 vs E5-2650 v3 |
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 | ![]() | More cores 14 |
![]() | More threads 28 | ![]() | Better PassMark score 18,007 |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 0.69 pt/$ |
![]() | Significantly better performance per watt 7.93 pt/W | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 85.31W |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.8 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3CPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 14 | vs | 10 | 4 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 28 | vs | 20 | 8 more threads | |||
Better PassMark score | 18,007 | vs | 14,951 | More than 20% better PassMark score | |||
Slightly higher Maximum operating temperature | 82.5 °C | vs | 78.9 °C | Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer | Apr, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date 9 months later | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 0.69 pt/$ | vs | 0.1 pt/$ | More than 7x better performance per dollar | |||
Significantly better performance per watt | 7.93 pt/W | vs | 3.87 pt/W | More than 2x better performance per watt | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 85.31W | vs | 97.5W | Around 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | vs | 28.91 $/year | Around 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | vs | 105.12 $/year | Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | Xeon E5-4660 v3 | vs | E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Processing Cores | Deca core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 786,432 MB |
details | Xeon E5-4660 v3 | vs | E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 28 | 20 | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 82.5°C | Unknown - 78.9°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 120W | 105W | |
Annual home energy cost | 28.91 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 105.12 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 3.87 pt/W | 7.93 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 97.5W | 85.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
Intel Xeon E5-4660 v3 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,155 | $1,200 | |
2650 v2 vs E5-2650 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,000 | $1,200 | |
E5-2640 v3 vs E5-2650 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,086 | $1,200 | |
E5-2690 vs E5-2650 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$681 | $1,200 | |
E5-2630 v3 vs E5-2650 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,200 | ||
E5-2689 vs E5-2650 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $1,200 | |
6700K vs E5-2650 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,166 | $1,200 | |
E5-2650V4 vs E5-2650 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
5300 vs 3220 | ||