Intel Xeon E5-4650 vs Itanium 9540 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-4650
- 2.7 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-4650
 | Much higher clock speed 2.7 GHz | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 105.63W |
| | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year | | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year |
VS
Released November, 2012
Intel Itanium 9540
- 2.13 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Itanium 9540
| | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Much more l3 cache 24 MB |
| | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | | Much more l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.7 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 105.63W | vs | 138.13W | Around 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | vs | 148.92 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | vs | 40.95 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 2 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l3 cache | 24 MB | vs | 20 MB | 20% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 2.5 MB/core | 20% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Newer | Nov, 2012 | vs | May, 2012 | Release date 5 months later | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon E5-4650 vs Itanium 9540
clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-4650 | vs | Itanium 9540 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
| Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 2011 | |||
| LGA 1248 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 130W | 170W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 40.95 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 148.92 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 138.13W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
details | Xeon E5-4650 | vs | Itanium 9540 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 16 | 16 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 20 MB | 24 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 4 | 8 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
| Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 3,200 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon E5-4650  Report a correction |  Intel Itanium 9540 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $4,394 | $3,900 | |
| Intel Xeon E7-4870 vs E5-4650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $4,616 | $3,900 | |
| Intel Xeon E7-8870 vs E5-4650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,126 | $3,900 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2650 vs E5-4650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $176 | $3,900 | |
| Intel Core i5 4670 vs Xeon E5-4650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,086 | $3,900 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2690 vs E5-4650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,594 | $3,900 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2670 vs E5-4650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $410 | $3,900 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2620 vs E5-4650 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
