0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5 4650 v2 vs E5-4627 v2 |
Released March, 2014
Intel Xeon E5 4650 v2
- 2.4 GHz
- Dodeca core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5 4650 v2
![]() | Much more l3 cache 25 MB | ![]() | More threads 20 |
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 77.19W | ![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year |
VS
Released January, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-4627 v2
- 3.3 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E5-4627 v2
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | ![]() | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz |
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 88 °C |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 25 MB | vs | 16 MB | More than 55% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 20 | vs | 8 | 12 more threads | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 105.63W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | Around 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 88 °C | vs | 75 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature |
Features Key features of the Xeon E5 4650 v2 vs E5-4627 v2
clock speed
Xeon E5 4650 v2
2.4 GHz
Xeon E5-4627 v2
3.3 GHz
turbo clock speed
Xeon E5 4650 v2
2.9 GHz
Xeon E5-4627 v2
3.6 GHz
L3 cache
Xeon E5 4650 v2
25 MB
Xeon E5-4627 v2
16 MB
TDP
Xeon E5 4650 v2
95W
Xeon E5-4627 v2
130W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5 4650 v2 | vs | E5-4627 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dodeca core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1866 | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 59,733.32 MB/s | 59,733.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 786,432 MB |
details | Xeon E5 4650 v2 | vs | E5-4627 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 20 | 8 | |
L3 cache | 25 MB | 16 MB | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 4 | |
Voltage range | 0.65 - 1.3V | 0.65 - 1.3V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 75°C | Unknown - 88°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 130W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 31.32 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 105.63W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 57,600 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 7,200 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 3,600 MHz |
Intel Xeon E5 4650 v2 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-4627 v2 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$3,616 | $3,900 | |
4650 v2 vs E5-4650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$3,616 | $4,115 | |
4650 v2 vs E5-2699 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$3,616 | $1,155 | |
4650 v2 vs 2650 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$3,616 | $456 | |
4650 v2 vs 3930K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,108 | $456 | |
E5-4627 v2 vs 3930K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,108 | $2,581 | |
E5-4627 v2 vs 2697 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,108 | $583 | |
E5-4627 v2 vs 1650 v2 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||