0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-4640 vs Core i7 3820 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-4640
- 2.4 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-4640
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Significantly more l3 cache 20 MB |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 77.19W | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 |
VS
Released February, 2012
Intel Core i7 3820
- 3.6 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i7 3820
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.6 GHz | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 4.08 pt/$ |
![]() | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.68 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Core i7 3820CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly more l3 cache | 20 MB | vs | 10 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 77.19W | vs | 139.6W | Around 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many threads | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Supports more RAM | 393,216 MB | vs | 65,771.52 MB | Supports around 6x more RAM | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | vs | 49.49 $/year | 2.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Better PassMark score | 10,523 | vs | 8,998 | More than 15% better PassMark score | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | vs | 138.93 $/year | More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | May, 2012 | vs | Feb, 2012 | Release date 3 months later | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 50% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 4.08 pt/$ | vs | 0.17 pt/$ | Around 23.5x better performance per dollar | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.68 GHz | vs | 2.63 GHz | Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better performance per watt | 6.18 pt/W | vs | 1.83 pt/W | More than 3.2x better performance per watt | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,943 | vs | 1,423 | More than 35% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.71 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-4640 vs Core i7 3820
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-4640
5,597.5
Core i7 3820
12,538
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-4640
1,573
Core i7 3820
3,098
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-4640
103.35 MB/s
Core i7 3820
2,500,000 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5-4640
10,523
Core i7 3820
8,998
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5-4640
1,423
Core i7 3820
1,943
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-4640 | vs | Core i7 3820 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 130W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 49.49 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 138.93 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.83 pt/W | 6.18 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 139.6W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Xeon E5-4640 | vs | Core i7 3820 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 20 MB | 10 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V | 0.6 - 1.35V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.63 GHz | 4.68 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 4.71 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.63 GHz | 4.68 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 51,200 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 65,771.52 MB |
Intel Xeon E5-4640 ![]() | Intel Core i7 3820 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $264 | |
Intel Core i7 3820 vs 3770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $248 | |
Intel Core i7 3820 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $240 | |
Intel Core i7 3820 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $260 | |
Intel Core i7 3820 vs 4820K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $280 | |
Intel Core i7 3820 vs 4770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $128 | |
Intel Core i7 3820 vs AMD FX 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 3820 vs 4790K | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||