CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-4640 v3 vs E5-4640 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Xeon E5-4640 v3 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-4640 v3  based on its performance and single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-4640 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-4640 v3

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 12 vs 8 4 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 24 vs 16 8 more threads
Supports more RAM 786,432 MB vs 393,216 MB Supports 2x more RAM
Newer Apr, 2015 vs May, 2012 Release date over 2 years later
Better PassMark score 12,121 vs 10,523 More than 15% better PassMark score
Better performance per watt 3.15 pt/W vs 1.83 pt/W More than 70% better performance per watt
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-4640

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-4640

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Slightly higher turbo clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 85.31W Around 10% lower typical power consumption
Slightly better performance per dollar 0.17 pt/$ vs 0.12 pt/$ More than 50% better performance per dollar
Lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 25.29 $/year Around 10% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 91.98 $/year Around 10% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-4640 v3 vs E5-4640

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-4640 v3  vs
E5-4640 
Clock speed 1.9 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.6 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Duodeca core Octa core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum memory size 786,432 MB 393,216 MB

details

Xeon E5-4640 v3  vs
E5-4640 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 24 16
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 4 4

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

power consumption

TDP 105W 95W
Annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 3.15 pt/W 1.83 pt/W
Typical power consumption 85.31W 77.19W

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 2
Data rate 64,000 MB/s 64,000 MB/s
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 8,000 MT/s
Clock speed 4,000 MHz 4,000 MHz
Intel Xeon E5-4640 v3
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E5-4640
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus