0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5 4624L v2 vs E5-4617 |
Released January, 2014
Intel Xeon E5 4624L v2
- 1.9 GHz
- Deca core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5 4624L v2
![]() | Much more l3 cache 25 MB | ![]() | More threads 20 |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 22.64 pt/W | ![]() | More l2 cache 2.5 MB |
VS
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-4617
- 2.9 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the E5-4617
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.9 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.9 GHz |
![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.9 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 25 MB | vs | 15 MB | More than 65% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 20 | vs | 6 | 14 more threads | |||
Much better performance per watt | 22.64 pt/W | vs | 3.2 pt/W | More than 7x better performance per watt | |||
More l2 cache | 2.5 MB | vs | 2 MB | 25% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 56.88W | vs | 105.63W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 61.32 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 16.86 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | Jan, 2014 | vs | May, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 55% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.9 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.9 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 4624L v2 vs E5-4617
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 4624L v2
55,680
Xeon E5-4617
35,383
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 4624L v2
2,296
Xeon E5-4617
2,644
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 4624L v2
1,735,000 MB/s
Xeon E5-4617
2,000 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5 4624L v2 | vs | E5-4617 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Cores | Deca core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 70W | 130W | |
Annual home energy cost | 16.86 $/year | 31.32 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 61.32 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 22.64 pt/W | 3.2 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 56.88W | 105.63W | |
bus | |||
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 7,200 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 3,600 MHz |
details | Xeon E5 4624L v2 | vs | E5-4617 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 20 | 6 | |
L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.33 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 25 MB | 15 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 4 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 |
Intel Xeon E5 4624L v2 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-4617 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,552 | $1,611 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2667 vs E5-4617 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,086 | $1,611 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 vs E5-4617 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,360 | $1,611 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2660 vs E5-4617 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$583 | $1,611 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1650 vs E5-4617 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,594 | $1,611 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2670 vs E5-4617 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,831 | $1,611 | |
Intel Xeon E5-4620 vs E5-4617 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$330 | $1,611 | |
Intel Core i7 2600K vs Xeon E5-4617 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||