Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5 4624L v2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5 4624L v2

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 55,680 vs 8,816 More than 6.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Much more l2 cache 2.5 MB vs 1 MB 2.5x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache 25 MB vs 6 MB Around 4.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 22.64 pt/W vs 9.04 pt/W More than 2.5x better performance per watt
More threads 20 vs 4 16 more threads
More cores 10 vs 4 6 more cores; run more applications at once
Significantly lower typical power consumption 56.88W vs 77.19W More than 25% lower typical power consumption
Significantly more l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core More than 65% more l3 cache per core
Newer Jan, 2014 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 3 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 16.86 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 25% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 61.32 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 2500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2500

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.9 GHz Around 75% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.7 GHz vs 1.9 GHz Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Better geekbench 3 single core score 2,796 vs 2,296 More than 20% better geekbench 3 single core score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.21 GHz vs 1.9 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 4624L v2 vs Core i5 2500

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5 4624L v2
1,735,000 MB/s
Core i5 2500
2,410,000 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5 4624L v2  vs
Core i5 2500 
Clock speed 1.9 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Deca core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 2011
LGA 1155
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 70W 95W
Annual home energy cost 16.86 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 61.32 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 22.64 pt/W 9.04 pt/W
Typical power consumption 56.88W 77.19W

bus

Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Xeon E5 4624L v2  vs
Core i5 2500 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 20 4
L2 cache 2.5 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 25 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 4 1
Clock multiplier 19 33

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.9 GHz 3.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.9 GHz 4.21 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.9 GHz 3.7 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2000
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 850 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Intel Xeon E5 4624L v2
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus