0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-4620 vs E5 4610 v2 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-4620
- 2.2 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-4620
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released January, 2014
Intel Xeon E5 4610 v2
- 2.3 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E5 4610 v2
![]() | Supports more RAM 786,432 MB | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz |
![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz | ![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Supports more RAM | 786,432 MB | vs | 393,216 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 5% higher clock speed | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 2.7 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Newer | Jan, 2014 | vs | May, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.3 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-4620 vs E5 4610 v2
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-4620
61,522
Xeon E5 4610 v2
21,993
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-4620
2,608
Xeon E5 4610 v2
1,723
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-4620
1,830 MB/s
Xeon E5 4610 v2
894,100 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-4620 | vs | E5 4610 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 5.25 pt/W | 8.03 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 57,600 MB/s | 57,600 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 7,200 MT/s | 7,200 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 3,600 MHz | 3,600 MHz |
details | Xeon E5-4620 | vs | E5 4610 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 16 | 16 | |
L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 4 | |
Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V | 0.65 - 1.3V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.32 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.32 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 42,666.64 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 786,432 MB |
Intel Xeon E5-4620 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5 4610 v2 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,831 | $3,900 | |
E5-4620 vs E5-4650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,831 | $1,126 | |
E5-4620 vs E5-2650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,831 | $901 | |
E5-4620 vs E5-2640 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,831 | $184 | |
E5-4620 vs 3570K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,831 | $2,086 | |
E5-4620 vs E5-2690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,831 | $1,871 | |
E5-4620 vs E5-4620 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,831 | $1,594 | |
E5-4620 vs E5-2670 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||