CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-4617 vs 3770 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 3770 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770  based on its power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-4617

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-4617

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 35,383 vs 12,524 More than 2.8x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
More l3 cache 15 MB vs 8 MB Around 90% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Supports more RAM 393,216 MB vs 32,768 MB Supports 12x more RAM
More l3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 25% more l3 cache per core
More l2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core Around 35% more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770

Report a correction
Much better performance per dollar 2.33 pt/$ vs 0.26 pt/$ Around 9x better performance per dollar
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Around 15% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 62.56W vs 105.63W More than 40% lower typical power consumption
Significantly better performance per watt 7.25 pt/W vs 3.2 pt/W More than 2.2x better performance per watt
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.03 GHz vs 2.9 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better geekbench 3 single core score 3,236 vs 2,644 More than 20% better geekbench 3 single core score
More threads 8 vs 6 2 more threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 18.55 $/year vs 31.32 $/year More than 40% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 67.45 $/year vs 113.88 $/year More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz vs 2.9 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-4617 vs Core i7 3770

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-4617
35,383
Core i7 3770
12,524

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-4617
2,000 MB/s
Core i7 3770
2,660,000 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-4617  vs
Core i7 3770 
Clock speed 2.9 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.4 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Hexa core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 2011
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 130W 77W
Annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year 18.55 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year 67.45 $/year
Performance per watt 3.2 pt/W 7.25 pt/W
Typical power consumption 105.63W 62.56W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI
Number of links 2 1
Transfer rate 7,200 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Xeon E5-4617  vs
Core i7 3770 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 6 8
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 15 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 4 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.9 GHz 4.03 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.9 GHz 4.32 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.9 GHz 4.03 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 11.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,339.9

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 51,200 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 393,216 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Xeon E5-4617
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3770
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus