0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-4610 vs Core i7 4770 |
Released May, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-4610
- 2.4 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-4610
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 |
![]() | More l3 cache 15 MB | ![]() | More cores 6 |
VS
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4770
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | ![]() | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 3.12 pt/$ | ![]() | Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 13,342 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
More l3 cache | 15 MB | vs | 8 MB | Around 90% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
Supports more RAM | 393,216 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 12x more RAM | |||
More threads | 12 | vs | 8 | 4 more threads | |||
More l3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | Around 35% more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | Around 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 3.12 pt/$ | vs | 0.72 pt/$ | More than 4.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 13,342 | vs | 2,552 | Around 5.2x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better geekbench 3 single core score | 3,514 | vs | 2,122 | More than 65% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.85 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 77.19W | More than 10% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.01 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jun, 2013 | vs | May, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-4610 vs Core i7 4770
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-4610
2,552
Core i7 4770
13,342
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-4610
2,122
Core i7 4770
3,514
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-4610
1,530,000 MB/s
Core i7 4770
4,500,000 MB/s
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-4610 | vs | Core i7 4770 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 84W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 9.87 pt/W | 10.41 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 2 | 0 | |
Transfer rate | 7,200 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Xeon E5-4610 | vs | Core i7 4770 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 12 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.33 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 15 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | 4.01 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | 3.85 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,200 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 42,666.64 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Xeon E5-4610 ![]() | Intel Core i7 4770 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $240 | |
4770 vs 3770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $305 | |
4770 vs 4790 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $248 | |
4770 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $160 | |
4770 vs 4570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $192 | |
4770 vs 4670K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
4770 vs 7800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | $190 | |
4770 vs 4460 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||