Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5 4610 v2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5 4610 v2

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.73 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 45% higher turbo clock speed
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
Much lower typical power consumption 77.19W vs 150.31W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year vs 162.06 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year vs 44.57 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Newer Jan, 2014 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 3 years later
Front view of Intel Itanium 9350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9350

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 24 MB vs 16 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much more l3 cache per core 6 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 3x more l3 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 4 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration

Features Key features of the Xeon E5 4610 v2  vs Itanium 9350 

clock speed

Xeon E5 4610 v2
2.3 GHz
Itanium 9350
1.73 GHz

turbo clock speed

Xeon E5 4610 v2
2.7 GHz
Itanium 9350
1.87 GHz

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5 4610 v2  vs
Itanium 9350 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 1.73 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz 1.87 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 2011
LGA 1248

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 185W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 44.57 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 162.06 $/year
Typical power consumption 77.19W 150.31W

details

Xeon E5 4610 v2  vs
Itanium 9350 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 16 8
L3 cache 16 MB 24 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 6 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 4 8

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 1
Data rate 57,600 MB/s 19,200 MB/s
Transfer rate 7,200 MT/s 4,800 MT/s
Clock speed 3,600 MHz 2,400 MHz
Intel Xeon E5 4610 v2
Report a correction
Intel Itanium 9350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus