CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4610 v2 vs 3770 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 3770 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3770  based on its power consumption and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5 4610 v2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5 4610 v2

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 21,993 vs 12,524 More than 75% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
More l3 cache 16 MB vs 8 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more RAM 786,432 MB vs 32,768 MB Supports 24x more RAM
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
Higher Maximum operating temperature 75 °C vs 67.4 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jan, 2014 vs Apr, 2012 Release date over 1 years later
Better performance per watt 8.03 pt/W vs 7.25 pt/W More than 10% better performance per watt
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 45% higher turbo clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better performance per dollar 2.33 pt/$ vs 0.63 pt/$ Around 3.8x better performance per dollar
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much better geekbench 3 single core score 3,236 vs 1,723 Around 90% better geekbench 3 single core score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.03 GHz vs 2.3 GHz More than 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower typical power consumption 62.56W vs 77.19W Around 20% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.32 GHz vs 2.3 GHz Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 18.55 $/year vs 22.89 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 67.45 $/year vs 83.22 $/year Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 4610 v2 vs Core i7 3770

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5 4610 v2
894,100 MB/s
Core i7 3770
2,660,000 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5 4610 v2  vs
Core i7 3770 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.7 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 2011
LGA 1155
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 77W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 18.55 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 67.45 $/year
Performance per watt 8.03 pt/W 7.25 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 62.56W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI
Number of links 2 1
Transfer rate 7,200 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Xeon E5 4610 v2  vs
Core i7 3770 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 16 8
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 4 1
Clock multiplier 23 34
Operating temperature Unknown - 75°C Unknown - 67.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.3 GHz 4.03 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.3 GHz 4.32 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.3 GHz 4.03 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 11.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,339.9

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3
Channels Quad Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 786,432 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Xeon E5 4610 v2
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3770
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus