Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 based on its cost to run and value.
See full details Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2698 v3 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
- 2.3 GHz
- Processing Cores
5.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
 | Much more l3 cache 45 MB | | More threads 36 |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.17 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- 2.3 GHz
- 16 core
5.5 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E5-2698 v3
| | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 87.9 °C | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.45 GHz |
| | Lower typical power consumption 109.69W | | Lower annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2698 v3 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 45 MB | vs | 40 MB | Around 15% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More threads | 36 | vs | 32 | 4 more threads | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.17 GHz | vs | 3.04 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 87.9 °C | vs | 76.4 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.45 GHz | vs | 2.84 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 109.69W | vs | 117.81W | More than 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | vs | 127.02 $/year | More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | vs | 34.93 $/year | More than 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2698 v3
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2699 v3 | vs | E5-2698 v3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Processing Cores | 16 core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 145W | 135W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 34.93 $/year | 32.52 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 127.02 $/year | 118.26 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.09 pt/W | 12.54 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 117.81W | 109.69W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz | |
details | Xeon E5-2699 v3 | vs | E5-2698 v3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 36 | 32 | |
| L3 cache | 45 MB | 40 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 76.4°C | Unknown - 87.9°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.84 GHz | 3.45 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.17 GHz | 3.04 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.84 GHz | 3.45 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 786,432 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,016 | $4,115 | |
| Intel Core i7 5960X vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $4,115 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $4,115 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $4,115 | $4,115 | |
| Intel E5-2699V4 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,806 | $4,115 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs E5-2699 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $390 | $4,115 | |
| Intel Core i7 5820K vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,745 | $4,115 | |
| Intel E5-2680V4 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
