CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2698 v3 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 45 MB vs 40 MB Around 15% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More threads 36 vs 32 4 more threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.17 GHz vs 3.04 GHz Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3

Report a correction
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 87.9 °C vs 76.4 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.45 GHz vs 2.84 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower typical power consumption 109.69W vs 117.81W More than 5% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year vs 127.02 $/year More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 32.52 $/year vs 34.93 $/year More than 5% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2698 v3

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2699 v3
2,980,000 MB/s
Xeon E5-2698 v3
3,940,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2699 v3  vs
E5-2698 v3 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2.3 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Processing Cores 16 core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
AVX
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 145W 135W
Annual home energy cost 34.93 $/year 32.52 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 127.02 $/year 118.26 $/year
Performance per watt 10.1 pt/W 12.55 pt/W
Typical power consumption 117.81W 109.69W

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 2
Data rate 76,800 MB/s 76,800 MB/s
Transfer rate 9,600 MT/s 9,600 MT/s
Clock speed 4,800 MHz 4,800 MHz

details

Xeon E5-2699 v3  vs
E5-2698 v3 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 36 32
L3 cache 45 MB 40 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Operating temperature Unknown - 76.4°C Unknown - 87.9°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.84 GHz 3.45 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.17 GHz 3.04 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.84 GHz 3.45 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum bandwidth 6,400 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 786,432 MB 786,432 MB
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
Report a correction
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus