Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2698 v3 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
- 2.3 GHz
- Processing Cores
5.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
 | Much more l3 cache 45 MB | | More threads 36 |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.17 GHz |
by hassan-mujtaba (Jun, 2014)So we know that the new Haswell architecture would further leverage the performance over the existing Ivy Bridge architecture based Xeon family delivering more performance with improved efficiency which is the key role of effectiveness in the enterprise and workstation scape.
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- 2.3 GHz
- 16 core
5.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E5-2698 v3
| | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 87.9 °C | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.45 GHz |
| | Lower typical power consumption 109.69W | | Lower annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year |
by hassan-mujtaba (Sep, 2014)The previous Ivy Bridge-EX flagship had 4.31 Billion transistors configured on a 541mm2 so its easy to tell that the Haswell-EP takes die size and transistor count to a new level.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2698 v3 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 45 MB | vs | 40 MB | Around 15% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More threads | 36 | vs | 32 | 4 more threads | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.17 GHz | vs | 3.04 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 87.9 °C | vs | 76.4 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.45 GHz | vs | 2.84 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 109.69W | vs | 117.81W | More than 5% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | vs | 127.02 $/year | More than 5% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | vs | 34.93 $/year | More than 5% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2698 v3
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2699 v3 | vs | E5-2698 v3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Processing Cores | 16 core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 145W | 135W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 34.93 $/year | 32.52 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 127.02 $/year | 118.26 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.09 pt/W | 12.54 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 117.81W | 109.69W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz | |
details | Xeon E5-2699 v3 | vs | E5-2698 v3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 36 | 32 | |
| L3 cache | 45 MB | 40 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 76.4°C | Unknown - 87.9°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.84 GHz | 3.45 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.17 GHz | 3.04 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.84 GHz | 3.45 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 786,432 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,016 | $4,115 | |
| Intel Core i7 5960X vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $4,115 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,581 | $4,115 | |
| Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2 vs E5-2699 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $4,115 | $4,115 | |
| Intel E5-2699V4 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $4,115 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,806 | $4,115 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs E5-2699 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $7,007 | $4,115 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 vs E5-2699 v3 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9420 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
