Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2697 v3 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
- 2.3 GHz
- Processing Cores
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
 | Much more l3 cache 45 MB | | More threads 36 |
VS
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
- 2.6 GHz
- Processing Cores
Reasons to buy the E5-2697 v3
| | Much higher clock speed 2.6 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.29 GHz |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.55 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 45 MB | vs | 35 MB | Around 30% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More threads | 36 | vs | 28 | 8 more threads | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.29 GHz | vs | 2.84 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.55 GHz | vs | 3.17 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2697 v3
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2699 v3 | vs | E5-2697 v3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Processing Cores | Processing Cores | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 145W | 145W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 34.93 $/year | 34.93 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 127.02 $/year | 127.02 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.09 pt/W | 10.17 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 117.81W | 117.81W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz | |
details | Xeon E5-2699 v3 | vs | E5-2697 v3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 36 | 28 | |
| L3 cache | 45 MB | 35 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 76.4°C | Unknown - 76.7°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.84 GHz | 3.29 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.17 GHz | 3.55 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.84 GHz | 3.29 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 786,432 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $4,115 | $1,016 | |
| E5-2699 v3 vs 5960X | ||
| | VS |  |
| $4,115 | $350 | |
| E5-2699 v3 vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $2,806 | $2,300 | |
| E5-2697 v3 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,806 | $2,702 | |
| E5-2697 v3 vs E5-2697V4 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,806 | $1,650 | |
| E5-2697 v3 vs E5-2670 v3 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,806 | $1,745 | |
| E5-2697 v3 vs E5-2680V4 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,806 | $1,552 | |
| E5-2697 v3 vs E5-2643 v3 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
