0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2689 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
- 2.3 GHz
- Processing Cores
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
![]() | Much more l3 cache 45 MB | ![]() | More threads 36 |
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Newer Jul, 2014 |
VS
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2689
- 2.6 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E5-2689
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.6 GHz | ![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 93.44W |
![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 45 MB | vs | 20 MB | 2.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More threads | 36 | vs | 16 | 20 more threads | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Newer | Jul, 2014 | vs | Mar, 2012 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.3 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 93.44W | vs | 117.81W | More than 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | vs | 127.02 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | vs | 34.93 $/year | More than 20% lower annual home energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2689
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2699 v3
31,169
Xeon E5-2689
36,294
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2699 v3
3,066
Xeon E5-2689
2,912
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5-2699 v3
2,980,000 MB/s
Xeon E5-2689
2,360,000 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5-2699 v3
22,645
Xeon E5-2689
19,521
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5-2699 v3
1,869
Xeon E5-2689
2,091
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2699 v3 | vs | E5-2689 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Cores | Processing Cores | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Xeon E5-2699 v3 | vs | E5-2689 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 36 | 16 | |
L3 cache | 45 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 145W | 115W | |
Annual home energy cost | 34.93 $/year | 27.7 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 127.02 $/year | 100.74 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.09 pt/W | 10.97 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 117.81W | 93.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2689 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$262 | ||
E5-2620 v3 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,155 | ||
2650 v2 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,086 | ||
E5-2690 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$901 | ||
E5-2640 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$410 | ||
E5-2620 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$240 | ||
3770 vs E5-2689 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||