Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Itanium 9540 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- 2.3 GHz
- 16 core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
 | Much more l3 cache 40 MB | | More threads 32 |
| | Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 109.69W |
VS
Released November, 2012
Intel Itanium 9540
- 2.13 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Itanium 9540
| | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | | More l3 cache per core 3 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 40 MB | vs | 24 MB | More than 65% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More threads | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.3 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 109.69W | vs | 138.13W | More than 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | vs | 148.92 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | vs | 40.95 $/year | More than 20% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2014 | vs | Nov, 2012 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 2.5 MB/core | 20% more l3 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2698 v3 vs Itanium 9540
clock speed
L3 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | Itanium 9540 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
| Cores | 16 core | Octa core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 135W | 170W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | 40.95 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | 148.92 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 109.69W | 138.13W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
details | Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | Itanium 9540 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 32 | 16 | |
| L3 cache | 40 MB | 24 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 8 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 1 | |
| Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 6,400 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 3,200 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3  Report a correction |  Intel Itanium 9540 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $4,115 | $3,226 | |
| E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2698 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,806 | $3,226 | |
| E5-2697 v3 vs E5-2698 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,016 | $3,226 | |
| 5960X vs E5-2698 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,846 | $3,226 | |
| E5-2683 v3 vs E5-2698 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,900 | $3,226 | |
| E5-2680 v3 vs E5-2698 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,300 | $3,226 | |
| E5-2690 v3 vs E5-2698 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $3,226 | |
| 6700K vs E5-2698 v3 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
