Winner
Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2 based on its value.
See full details | Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2 vs 1650 v2 |
![]() | Much more l3 cache 30 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 3 MB |
![]() | More threads 24 | ![]() | Supports more RAM 786,432 MB |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | ![]() | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 3.02 pt/$ | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.21 GHz |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.8 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 30 MB | vs | 12 MB | 2.5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache | 3 MB | vs | 1.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More threads | 24 | vs | 12 | Twice as many threads | |||
Supports more RAM | 786,432 MB | vs | 262,144 MB | Supports 3x more RAM | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 86 °C | vs | 70 °C | Around 25% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 3.02 pt/$ | vs | 0.46 pt/$ | More than 6.5x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.21 GHz | vs | 3.11 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.45 GHz | vs | 3.42 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
summary | Xeon E5 2697 v2 | vs | 1650 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Cores | Dodeca core | Hexa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 2011 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 130W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 31.32 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 9.11 pt/W | 13.53 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 105.63W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 0 | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 0 MT/s |
details | Xeon E5 2697 v2 | vs | 1650 v2 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 24 | 12 | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 1.5 MB | |
L3 cache | 30 MB | 12 MB | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 27 | 35 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 86°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.11 GHz | 4.21 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.42 GHz | 4.45 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.11 GHz | 4.21 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1866 | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 59,733.32 MB/s | 59,733.32 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 262,144 MB |
Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5 1650 v2 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$583 | $583 | |
1650 v2 vs E5-1650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$583 | $586 | |
1650 v2 vs E5-1650 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$583 | $1,155 | |
1650 v2 vs 2650 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$583 | $294 | |
1650 v2 vs 1620 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$583 | ||
1650 v2 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,581 | $2,032 | |
2697 v2 vs 2690 v2 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,581 | $2,086 | |
2697 v2 vs E5-2690 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||