0 Comments
| Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2 vs Core i7 4770K |
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2
- 2.7 GHz
- Dodeca core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2
![]() | Much more l2 cache 3 MB | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 30 MB |
![]() | More threads 24 | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 17,812 |
VS
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770K
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4770K
![]() | Is unlocked Yes | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 3.83 pt/$ |
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 3 MB | vs | 1 MB | 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l3 cache | 30 MB | vs | 8 MB | 3.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More threads | 24 | vs | 8 | Three times as many threads | |||
Much better PassMark score | 17,812 | vs | 10,016 | Around 80% better PassMark score | |||
Supports more RAM | 786,432 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 24x more RAM | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 86 °C | vs | 72.72 °C | Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 3.83 pt/$ | vs | 0.46 pt/$ | More than 8.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 105.63W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.48 GHz | vs | 3.11 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,165 | vs | 1,685 | Around 30% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better performance per watt | 11.31 pt/W | vs | 9.11 pt/W | Around 25% better performance per watt | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.55 GHz | vs | 3.42 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 2697 v2 vs Core i7 4770K
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 2697 v2
29,581
Core i7 4770K
14,184
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 2697 v2
2,892
Core i7 4770K
3,689
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 2697 v2
2,320,000 MB/s
Core i7 4770K
4,810,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 2697 v2
29,205
Core i7 4770K
14,351
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Xeon E5 2697 v2
32,651
Core i7 4770K
15,778
GeekBench
Xeon E5 2697 v2
32,651
Core i7 4770K
18,498
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Xeon E5 2697 v2
17,812
Core i7 4770K
10,016
PassMark (Single Core)
Xeon E5 2697 v2
1,685
Core i7 4770K
2,165
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5 2697 v2 | vs | Core i7 4770K |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Cores | Dodeca core | Quad core | |
Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 130W | 84W | |
Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 9.11 pt/W | 11.31 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 2 | 0 | |
Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s |
details | Xeon E5 2697 v2 | vs | Core i7 4770K |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 24 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB | |
L3 cache | 30 MB | 8 MB | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 86°C | Unknown - 72.72°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.11 GHz | 4.48 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.42 GHz | 4.55 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.11 GHz | 4.48 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,250 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1866 | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3-1066 | |||
DDR3-800 | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 59,733.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2 ![]() | Intel Core i7 4770K ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $248 | |
4790K vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$192 | $248 | |
4670K vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$128 | $248 | |
8350 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $248 | |
3770K vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$260 | $248 | |
4820K vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $248 | |
4790 vs 4770K | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||