Winner
Intel Core i7 4770K
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 4770K based on its single-core performance and value.
See full details Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2 vs Core i7 4770K |
Released July, 2013
Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2
- 2.7 GHz
- Dodeca core
5.8 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2
 | Much more l2 cache 3 MB | | Much more l3 cache 30 MB |
| | More threads 24 | | Much better PassMark score 17,812 |
VS
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770K
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
9.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4770K
| | Is unlocked Yes | | Much better performance per dollar 3.83 pt/$ |
| | Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2697 v2 vs 4770K among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 9.2 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 3 MB | vs | 1 MB | 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l3 cache | 30 MB | vs | 8 MB | 3.8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More threads | 24 | vs | 8 | Three times as many threads | |||
| Much better PassMark score | 17,812 | vs | 10,016 | Around 80% better PassMark score | |||
| Supports more RAM | 786,432 MB | vs | 32,768 MB | Supports 24x more RAM | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 86 °C | vs | 72.72 °C | Around 20% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 3.83 pt/$ | vs | 0.46 pt/$ | More than 8.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 3.5 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 105.63W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.48 GHz | vs | 3.11 GHz | Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 2,165 | vs | 1,685 | Around 30% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better performance per watt | 11.31 pt/W | vs | 9.11 pt/W | Around 25% better performance per watt | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.55 GHz | vs | 3.42 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 2697 v2 vs Core i7 4770K
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5 2697 v2 | vs | Core i7 4770K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Dodeca core | Quad core | |
| Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 130W | 84W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 9.11 pt/W | 11.31 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 2 | 0 | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Xeon E5 2697 v2 | vs | Core i7 4770K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 24 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB | |
| L3 cache | 30 MB | 8 MB | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 86°C | Unknown - 72.72°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.11 GHz | 4.48 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.42 GHz | 4.55 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.11 GHz | 4.48 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,250 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 59,733.32 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2  Report a correction |  Intel Core i7 4770K Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $248 | |
| 4790K vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $192 | $248 | |
| 4670K vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $128 | $248 | |
| 8350 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $264 | $248 | |
| 3770K vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $260 | $248 | |
| 4820K vs 4770K | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | $248 | |
| 4770 vs 4770K | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
