Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 30 MB vs 16 MB Around 90% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,685 vs 1,046 More than 60% better PassMark (Single core) score
More threads 24 vs 16 8 more threads
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Front view of AMD Opteron 6287 SE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 6287 SE

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 16 MB vs 3 MB More than 5.2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 5% higher clock speed
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 2 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5 2697 v2 vs Opteron 6287 SE

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5 2697 v2  vs
Opteron 6287 SE 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Dodeca core 16 core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES

details

Xeon E5 2697 v2  vs
Opteron 6287 SE 
Threads 24 16
L2 cache 3 MB 16 MB
L3 cache 30 MB 16 MB
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 4

power consumption

Typical power consumption 105.63W N/A

bus

Architecture QPI HyperTransport 3.0
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 6,400 MT/s
Clock speed 4,000 MHz 3,200 MHz
Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 6287 SE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus