Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 0.4 GHz 6.8x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 0.25 MB 12x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Sep, 2000 Release date over 12 years later
Front view of AMD K6-IIIE+ 400

Reasons to consider the
AMD K6-IIIE+ 400

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD K6-IIIE+ 400 vs the Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2.

Features Key features of the Xeon E5 2697 v2  vs K6-IIIE+ 400 

clock speed

Xeon E5 2697 v2
2.7 GHz
K6-IIIE+ 400
0.4 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5 2697 v2  vs
K6-IIIE+ 400 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 0.4 GHz
Socket type
LGA 2011
Super 7

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

bus

Clock speed 4,000 MHz 100 MHz

details

Xeon E5 2697 v2  vs
K6-IIIE+ 400 
L2 cache 3 MB 0.25 MB
Manufacture process 22 nm 180 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption 105.63W N/A
Intel Xeon E5 2697 v2
Report a correction
AMD K6-IIIE+ 400
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus