Intel Xeon E5-2690 vs E5-2670 |
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2690
- 2.9 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2690
 | Much higher clock speed 2.9 GHz | | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.92 GHz |
VS
Released March, 2012
Intel Xeon E5-2670
- 2.6 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the E5-2670
| | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 80 °C | | Lower typical power consumption 93.44W |
| | Lower annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year | | Lower annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.9 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | vs | 3.3 GHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.53 GHz | vs | 3.13 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.92 GHz | vs | 3.08 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 80 °C | vs | 72 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 93.44W | vs | 109.69W | Around 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | vs | 118.26 $/year | Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | vs | 32.52 $/year | Around 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2690 vs E5-2670
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2690 | vs | E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 2011 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 135W | 115W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | 27.7 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | 100.74 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 7.64 pt/W | 7.31 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 109.69W | 93.44W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3-800 | |||
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 51,200 MB/s | 51,200 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 393,216 MB | 393,216 MB | |
details | Xeon E5-2690 | vs | E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 16 | 16 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 20 MB | 20 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Clock multiplier | 38 | 33 | |
| Voltage range | 0.6 - 1.35V | 0.6 - 1.35V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C | Unknown - 80°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 7 | 3 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.53 GHz | 3.13 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.92 GHz | 3.08 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.53 GHz | 3.13 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 64,000 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 8,000 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 4,000 MHz | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2690  Report a correction |  Intel Xeon E5-2670 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $2,086 | ||
| E5-2690 vs E5-2689 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,086 | $1,100 | |
| E5-2690 vs 3970X | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,086 | $2,032 | |
| E5-2690 vs 2690 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $2,086 | $248 | |
| E5-2690 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $1,594 | $350 | |
| E5-2670 vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,594 | $1,534 | |
| E5-2670 vs 2670 v2 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $1,594 | $1,443 | |
| E5-2670 vs X5670 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
