Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Xeon E5-2690

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2690

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2690

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2690

Report a correction
Higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Around 20% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly more l3 cache 20 MB vs 10 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 14,178 vs 8,061 More than 75% better PassMark score
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
Significantly better performance per watt 7.64 pt/W vs 2.99 pt/W More than 2.5x better performance per watt
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz vs 2.6 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,853 vs 1,673 More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.92 GHz vs 3.31 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel E5-2623V4

Reasons to consider the
Intel E5-2623V4

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 69.06W vs 109.69W More than 35% lower typical power consumption
Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB vs 393,216 MB Supports 4x more RAM
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Mar, 2012 Release date over 3 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 20.48 $/year vs 32.52 $/year More than 35% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 74.46 $/year vs 118.26 $/year More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per dollar 0.57 pt/$ vs 0.49 pt/$ More than 15% better performance per dollar

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2690 vs E5-2623V4

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2690
28,226
E5-2623V4
17,846

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2690
2,646
E5-2623V4
2,997

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2690
1,975,000 MB/s
E5-2623V4
2,820 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E5-2690
14,178
E5-2623V4
8,061

PassMark (Single Core)

Xeon E5-2690
1,853
E5-2623V4
1,673

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2690  vs
E5-2623V4 
Clock speed 2.9 GHz 2.6 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
AVX 2.0
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 135W 85W
Annual home energy cost 32.52 $/year 20.48 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year 74.46 $/year
Performance per watt 7.64 pt/W 2.99 pt/W
Typical power consumption 109.69W 69.06W

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 2 2
Data rate 64,000 MB/s 64,000 MB/s
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 8,000 MT/s
Clock speed 4,000 MHz 4,000 MHz

details

Xeon E5-2690  vs
E5-2623V4 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 16 8
L3 cache 20 MB 10 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 73°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.53 GHz 2.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.92 GHz 3.31 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz 2.6 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes Yes
Maximum memory size 393,216 MB 1,572,864 MB
Intel Xeon E5-2690
Report a correction
Intel E5-2623V4
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus