CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2690 vs 3970X among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i7 3970X 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i7 3970X  based on its single-core performance and value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2690

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2690

Report a correction
More l3 cache 20 MB vs 15 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
Lower typical power consumption 109.69W vs 121.88W 10% lower typical power consumption
More cores 8 vs 6 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 12 4 more threads
Supports more RAM 393,216 MB vs 65,996.8 MB Supports around 6x more RAM
Better PassMark score 14,178 vs 12,923 Around 10% better PassMark score
Higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C vs 66.8 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower annual home energy cost 32.52 $/year vs 36.13 $/year Around 10% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year vs 131.4 $/year 10% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 3970X

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3970X

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Much better performance per dollar 1.11 pt/$ vs 0.49 pt/$ More than 2.2x better performance per dollar
Slightly higher turbo clock speed 4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.57 GHz vs 3.53 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better PassMark (Single core) score 2,047 vs 1,853 More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
More l2 cache per core 0.33 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core Around 35% more l2 cache per core
Newer Nov, 2012 vs Mar, 2012 Release date 8 months later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.44 GHz vs 3.92 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2690 vs Core i7 3970X

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2690
28,226
Core i7 3970X
19,564

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2690
1,975,000 MB/s
Core i7 3970X
2,690,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2690
20,376
Core i7 3970X
19,956

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Xeon E5-2690
31,327
Core i7 3970X
20,836

GeekBench

Xeon E5-2690
31,327
Core i7 3970X
21,346

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Xeon E5-2690
14,178
Core i7 3970X
12,923

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2690  vs
Core i7 3970X 
Clock speed 2.9 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Octa core Hexa core
Socket type
LGA 2011

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 135W 150W
Annual home energy cost 32.52 $/year 36.13 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year 131.4 $/year
Performance per watt 7.64 pt/W 8.17 pt/W
Typical power consumption 109.69W 121.88W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
DDR3-800
Channels Quad Channel Quad Channel
Supports ECC Yes No
Maximum bandwidth 51,200 MB/s 51,200 MB/s
Maximum memory size 393,216 MB 65,996.8 MB

details

Xeon E5-2690  vs
Core i7 3970X 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 16 12
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.33 MB/core
L3 cache 20 MB 15 MB
L3 cache per core 2.5 MB/core 2.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 2 1
Clock multiplier 38 35
Voltage range 0.6 - 1.35V 0.6 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C Unknown - 66.8°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 7 28
Overclocked clock speed 3.53 GHz 4.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.92 GHz 4.44 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz 4.57 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture QPI DMI 2.0
Number of links 2 1
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Xeon E5-2690
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3970X
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus