Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Xeon E5-2690

Reasons to consider the
Intel Xeon E5-2690

Report a correction
More cores 8 vs 1 7 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 1 15 more threads
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark score 14,178 vs 693 Around 20.5x better PassMark score
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,853 vs 889 More than 2x better PassMark (Single core) score
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 7.64 pt/W vs 0.69 pt/W More than 11x better performance per watt
Higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 5% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz vs 3 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.92 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Mar, 2012 vs Aug, 2005 Release date over 6 years later
Front view of AMD Opteron 254

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 254

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 75.24W vs 109.69W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 81.12 $/year vs 118.26 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 22.31 $/year vs 32.52 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2690 vs Opteron 254

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Xeon E5-2690  vs
Opteron 254 
Clock speed 2.9 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Octa core Single core
Socket type
LGA 2011
940

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Xeon E5-2690  vs
Opteron 254 
Threads 16 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 2 2
Clock multiplier 38 14
Voltage range 0.6 - 1.35V 1.3 - UnknownV
Operating temperature Unknown - 72°C 0 - 67°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.53 GHz 3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.92 GHz 2.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.53 GHz 3 GHz

power consumption

TDP 135W 92.6W
Annual home energy cost 32.52 $/year 22.31 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 118.26 $/year 81.12 $/year
Performance per watt 7.64 pt/W 0.69 pt/W
Typical power consumption 109.69W 75.24W
Intel Xeon E5-2690
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 254
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus