Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 based on its cost to run.
See full details | Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs E5-2630 v3 |
![]() | Much more l3 cache 30 MB | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 10.63 pt/W | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 89.9 °C |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 69.06W | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 74.46 $/year |
![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 20.48 $/year |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 30 MB | vs | 20 MB | 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much better performance per watt | 10.63 pt/W | vs | 3.52 pt/W | More than 3x better performance per watt | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 89.9 °C | vs | 72.1 °C | Around 25% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.2 GHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
More threads | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more threads | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.13 GHz | vs | 2.75 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 69.06W | vs | 109.69W | More than 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 74.46 $/year | vs | 118.26 $/year | More than 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 20.48 $/year | vs | 32.52 $/year | More than 35% lower annual home energy cost |
summary | Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Cores | Duodeca core | Octa core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
AVX | |||
AVX 2.0 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 135W | 85W | |
Annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | 20.48 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | 74.46 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 10.63 pt/W | 3.52 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 109.69W | 69.06W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 64,000 MB/s | |
Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 8,000 MT/s | |
Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,000 MHz |
details | Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 24 | 16 | |
L3 cache | 30 MB | 20 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 89.9°C | Unknown - 72.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.13 GHz | 2.75 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.13 GHz | 2.75 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR | |||
Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 786,432 MB |
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 ![]() | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$681 | $612 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs E5-2630L v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$681 | $556 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs E3-1285 v4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$681 | $262 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs E5-2620 v3 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$681 | $667 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs E5-2630V4 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$681 | $272 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Core i7 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$681 | $350 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs Core i7 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,300 | ||
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs E5-2689 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||