Winner
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
CPUBoss recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 based on its single-core performance and value.
See full details Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs E5-2667V4 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- 2.6 GHz
- Duodeca core
6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
 | More l3 cache 30 MB | | Much better performance per watt 10.63 pt/W |
| | More cores 12 | | More threads 24 |
VS
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2667V4
- 3.2 GHz
- Octa core
5.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the E5-2667V4
| | Higher clock speed 3.2 GHz | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
| | Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB | | Significantly more l3 cache per core 3.13 MB/core |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of E5-2690 v3 vs E5-2667V4 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 6 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More l3 cache | 30 MB | vs | 25 MB | 20% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better performance per watt | 10.63 pt/W | vs | 3.45 pt/W | More than 3x better performance per watt | |||
| More cores | 12 | vs | 8 | 4 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more threads | |||
| Significantly better performance per dollar | 0.62 pt/$ | vs | 0.23 pt/$ | More than 2.8x better performance per dollar | |||
| Better PassMark score | 19,320 | vs | 16,389 | Around 20% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 89.9 °C | vs | 78 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 3.2 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 786,432 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
| Significantly more l3 cache per core | 3.13 MB/core | vs | 2.5 MB/core | 25% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.5 GHz | vs | 3.13 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.2 GHz | vs | 3 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs E5-2667V4
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | E5-2667V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Duodeca core | Octa core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 135W | 135W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | 32.52 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | 118.26 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 10.63 pt/W | 3.45 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 109.69W | 109.69W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz | |
details | Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | E5-2667V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 24 | 16 | |
| L3 cache | 30 MB | 25 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 3.13 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 89.9°C | Unknown - 78°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.13 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.13 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 1,572,864 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3  Report a correction |  Intel E5-2667V4 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,745 | $2,300 | |
| E5-2680V4 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,300 | ||
| E5-2689 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,086 | $2,300 | |
| E5-2690 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,900 | $2,300 | |
| E5-2680 v3 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,032 | $2,300 | |
| 2690 v2 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,090 | $2,300 | |
| E5-2690V4 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $2,057 | $2,057 | |
| E5-2667 v3 vs E5-2667V4 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
