Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs E5-2650V4 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- 2.6 GHz
- Duodeca core
Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
 | Higher turbo clock speed 3.5 GHz | | Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.13 GHz | | Higher Maximum operating temperature 89.9 °C |
VS
Released January, 2016
Intel E5-2650V4
- 2.2 GHz
- Duodeca core
Reasons to buy the E5-2650V4
| | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 85.31W |
| | Supports more RAM 1,572,864 MB | | Newer Jan, 2016 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | More than 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.2 GHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.13 GHz | vs | 2.58 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 89.9 °C | vs | 80 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 85.31W | vs | 109.69W | More than 20% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Supports more RAM | 1,572,864 MB | vs | 786,432 MB | Supports 2x more RAM | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | vs | 32.52 $/year | More than 20% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | vs | 118.26 $/year | More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs E5-2650V4
clock speed
turbo clock speed
L3 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | E5-2650V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Duodeca core | Duodeca core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 135W | 105W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 32.52 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 118.26 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 109.69W | 85.31W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | QPI | |
| Number of links | 2 | 2 | |
| Data rate | 76,800 MB/s | 76,800 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 9,600 MT/s | 9,600 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz | |
details | Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | E5-2650V4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 24 | 24 | |
| L3 cache | 30 MB | 30 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.5 MB/core | 2.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 2 | 2 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 89.9°C | Unknown - 80°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.13 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.13 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Channels | Quad Channel | Quad Channel | |
| Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | |
| Maximum memory size | 786,432 MB | 1,572,864 MB | |
 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3  Report a correction |  Intel E5-2650V4 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $2,090 | $2,300 | |
| E5-2690V4 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,900 | $2,300 | |
| E5-2680 v3 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $4,115 | $2,300 | |
| E5-2699 v3 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $2,086 | $2,300 | |
| E5-2690 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,500 | $2,300 | |
| E5-2660 v3 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,745 | $2,300 | |
| E5-2680V4 vs E5-2690 v3 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $1,200 | $1,166 | |
| E5-2650 v3 vs E5-2650V4 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
